head to head · open source

drawDB vs lowdb

drawDB has 39,590 GitHub stars, 3,253 forks, 241 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. lowdb has 22,580 stars, 962 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. drawDB leads on adoption by 75% (39,590 vs 22,580 stars). drawDB is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; lowdb is written in JavaScript under MIT. drawDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, lowdb 4%. drawDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

drawDB ★ 40K lowdb ★ 23K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

drawDB lowdb
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 23K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-03-27
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 962
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick drawDB if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full drawDB profile →

pick lowdb if

  • You want the lowdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and lowdb fits your workflow better

full lowdb profile →

About drawDB

drawDB is a free, open source, browser based database entity relationship diagram (ERD) editor and SQL generator for developers, data modellers, and teams who need to design database schemas and turn them into SQL scripts without creating an account.

read the full drawDB overview →

About lowdb

lowdb is a small, MIT licensed embedded JSON database for JavaScript and TypeScript that persists data to a plain db.json file, aimed at Node.js, Electron, and browser projects that need local storage without running a database server.

read the full lowdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

drawDB vs mall drawDB vs Prometheus drawDB vs NocoDB drawDB vs etcd drawDB vs DBeaver drawDB vs orm drawDB vs Milvus drawDB vs TiDB drawDB vs typeorm drawDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager drawDB vs Qdrant drawDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is drawDB or lowdb more popular?

drawDB has 39,590 GitHub stars and lowdb has 22,580. drawDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are drawDB and lowdb free?

Both are open source. drawDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and lowdb under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between drawDB and lowdb?

drawDB is written in JavaScript and lowdb in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, drawDB or lowdb?

Choose drawDB if you want the larger community (39,590 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose lowdb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.