head to head · open source

drawDB vs Activeloop

drawDB has 39,590 GitHub stars, 3,253 forks, 241 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Activeloop has 9,241 stars, 722 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. drawDB leads on adoption by 328% (39,590 vs 9,241 stars). drawDB is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Activeloop is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. drawDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Activeloop 8%. drawDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

drawDB ★ 40K Activeloop ★ 9.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

drawDB Activeloop
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 9.2K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-21
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 722
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick drawDB if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full drawDB profile →

pick Activeloop if

  • You want the Activeloop feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Activeloop fits your workflow better

full Activeloop profile →

About drawDB

drawDB is a free, open source, browser based database entity relationship diagram (ERD) editor and SQL generator for developers, data modellers, and teams who need to design database schemas and turn them into SQL scripts without creating an account.

read the full drawDB overview →

About Activeloop

Activeloop Deep Lake is an open source database for AI data, written in C++ under Apache 2.0. It presents itself as a tensor database and AI data runtime for agents, combining serverless Postgres with a multimodal datalake for scalable retrieval and training. The project lives in the machine learning infrastructure ecosystem.

read the full Activeloop overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

drawDB vs mall drawDB vs Prometheus drawDB vs NocoDB drawDB vs etcd drawDB vs DBeaver drawDB vs orm drawDB vs Milvus drawDB vs TiDB drawDB vs typeorm drawDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager drawDB vs Qdrant drawDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is drawDB or Activeloop more popular?

drawDB has 39,590 GitHub stars and Activeloop has 9,241. drawDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are drawDB and Activeloop free?

Both are open source. drawDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Activeloop under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between drawDB and Activeloop?

drawDB is written in JavaScript and Activeloop in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, drawDB or Activeloop?

Choose drawDB if you want the larger community (39,590 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Activeloop if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.