head to head · open source

DoKit vs debug

DoKit has 20,415 GitHub stars, 3,183 forks, 275 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. debug has 11,454 stars, 991 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. DoKit leads on adoption by 78% (20,415 vs 11,454 stars). DoKit is written in Java under Apache-2.0; debug is written in JavaScript under MIT. DoKit has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, debug 9%. DoKit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DoKit ★ 20K debug ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DoKit debug
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-04-01
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 991
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DoKit if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DoKit profile →

pick debug if

  • You want the debug feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and debug fits your workflow better

full debug profile →

About DoKit

DoKit is an Apache 2.0 efficiency platform for the full research and development lifecycle of pan frontend products — Android, iOS, mini programs, Flutter and Web — built for mobile developers, test engineers and UI designers who want debugging, performance monitoring and visual inspection tooling inside a debug build instead of hand rolled into each application.

read the full DoKit overview →

About debug

debug is a tiny, MIT licensed JavaScript debugging utility modelled after Node.js core's debugging technique, and it is aimed at JavaScript developers and library authors who want to turn debug output on and off by namespace instead of editing or deleting logging statements.

read the full debug overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

DoKit vs Uptime Kuma DoKit vs worldmonitor DoKit vs NetData DoKit vs Grafana DoKit vs huginn DoKit vs Sentry DoKit vs SigNoz DoKit vs Grafana Loki DoKit vs beszel DoKit vs cilium DoKit vs Apache SkyWalking DoKit vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is DoKit or debug more popular?

DoKit has 20,415 GitHub stars and debug has 11,454. DoKit has the larger community by that measure.

Are DoKit and debug free?

Both are open source. DoKit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and debug under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DoKit and debug?

DoKit is written in Java and debug in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DoKit or debug?

Choose DoKit if you want the larger community (20,415 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose debug if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.