head to head · open source
DoKit vs codeburn
DoKit has 20,415 GitHub stars, 3,183 forks, 275 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. codeburn has 11,063 stars, 839 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DoKit leads on adoption by 85% (20,415 vs 11,063 stars). DoKit is written in Java under Apache-2.0; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. DoKit has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. codeburn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| DoKit | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 11K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 839 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick DoKit if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About DoKit
DoKit is an Apache 2.0 efficiency platform for the full research and development lifecycle of pan frontend products — Android, iOS, mini programs, Flutter and Web — built for mobile developers, test engineers and UI designers who want debugging, performance monitoring and visual inspection tooling inside a debug build instead of hand rolled into each application.
read the full DoKit overview →
About codeburn
CodeBurn is a free, open source, local first tool that tracks AI coding token usage and cost across 41 tools and agents, including Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, and Grok. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under MIT, and lives in the developer tools and observability ecosystem as a command line utility with optional desktop surfaces. Every surface reads the session files that the supported tools already write to disk, so CodeBurn acts as one source of truth rather than a separate collection layer.
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is DoKit or codeburn more popular?
DoKit has 20,415 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,063. DoKit has the larger community by that measure.
Are DoKit and codeburn free?
Both are open source. DoKit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and codeburn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between DoKit and codeburn?
DoKit is written in Java and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, DoKit or codeburn?
Choose DoKit if you want the larger community (20,415 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.