head to head · open source

DeskcommCRM vs Cossistant

DeskcommCRM has 3,330 GitHub stars, 812 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped today. Cossistant has 723 stars, 49 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. DeskcommCRM leads on adoption by 361% (3,330 vs 723 stars). DeskcommCRM is written in TypeScript under MIT; Cossistant is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. DeskcommCRM has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, Cossistant 7%. DeskcommCRM was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, nextjs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DeskcommCRM ★ 3.3K Cossistant ★ 723 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

DeskcommCRM Cossistant
GitHub stars ★ 3.3K ★ 723
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 812 ⑂ 49
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DeskcommCRM if

  • You weight community size — 3.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DeskcommCRM profile →

pick Cossistant if

  • You want the Cossistant feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Cossistant fits your workflow better

full Cossistant profile →

About DeskcommCRM

DeskcommCRM is an open source AI sales OS. It is a self hosted CRM with native AI agents and WhatsApp support through WAHA. It lives in the Business Software / Customer Support & Success ecosystem. The project targets businesses that sell by chat. It is presented as an open alternative to Kommo, Octadesk, and Intercom.

read the full DeskcommCRM overview →

About Cossistant

Cossistant is an open source, AI native customer support platform for React and Next.js developers and SaaS startups that need a customizable chat support widget with AI support agents, real time messaging, and complete backend infrastructure they can host themselves.

read the full Cossistant overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

chatwoot vs deskcommcrm chatwoot vs botpress chatwoot vs glpi chatwoot vs zammad chatwoot vs chaskiq chatwoot vs frappe-helpdesk chatwoot vs libredesk chatwoot vs goflylivechat opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Customer Support & Success projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Customer Support & Success field.

DeskcommCRM vs Chatwoot DeskcommCRM vs glpi DeskcommCRM vs Zammad DeskcommCRM vs Chaskiq DeskcommCRM vs Frappe Helpdesk DeskcommCRM vs libredesk DeskcommCRM vs goflylivechat DeskcommCRM vs Usertour DeskcommCRM vs TikTokLive DeskcommCRM vs iTop DeskcommCRM vs rt DeskcommCRM vs chatwoot-mobile-app

Frequently asked questions

Is DeskcommCRM or Cossistant more popular?

DeskcommCRM has 3,330 GitHub stars and Cossistant has 723. DeskcommCRM has the larger community by that measure.

Are DeskcommCRM and Cossistant free?

Both are open source. DeskcommCRM is licensed under MIT and Cossistant under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DeskcommCRM and Cossistant?

DeskcommCRM is written in TypeScript and Cossistant in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DeskcommCRM or Cossistant?

Choose DeskcommCRM if you want the larger community (3,330 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Cossistant if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.