head to head · open source

DBeaver vs valkey

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. valkey has 27,228 stars, 1,313 forks, 894 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DBeaver leads on adoption by 90% (51,791 vs 27,228 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; valkey is written in C under BSD-3-Clause. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, valkey 5%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (database, nosql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K valkey ★ 27K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver valkey
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 27K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Java C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick valkey if

  • You want the valkey feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and valkey fits your workflow better

full valkey profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About valkey

Valkey is high performance data structure server. Serves key/value workloads first. Supports wide range of native structures plus extensible plugin system for new data structures and access patterns. Written in C, licensed BSD 3 Clause. Lives in key value store and NoSQL ecosystem, shares protocol lineage with Redis, and carries cache , database , key value store , redis , valkey client topics.

read the full valkey overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or valkey more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and valkey has 27,228. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and valkey free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and valkey under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and valkey?

DBeaver is written in Java and valkey in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or valkey?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose valkey if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.