head to head · open source

DBeaver vs ubicloud

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped today. ubicloud has 12,267 stars, 587 forks, 95 open issues and last shipped today. DBeaver leads on adoption by 322% (51,797 vs 12,267 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; ubicloud is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, ubicloud 5%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K ubicloud ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver ubicloud
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java Ruby
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 587
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick ubicloud if

  • You want the ubicloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and ubicloud fits your workflow better

full ubicloud profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About ubicloud

Ubicloud is an open source cloud platform that delivers IaaS features — elastic compute, non replicated block storage, firewall and load balancer, managed Postgres, Kubernetes, AI inference, and IAM services — on bare metal hardware, for teams that want public cloud convenience without closed source lock in or premium rental pricing.

read the full ubicloud overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or ubicloud more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and ubicloud has 12,267. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and ubicloud free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ubicloud under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and ubicloud?

DBeaver is written in Java and ubicloud in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or ubicloud?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ubicloud if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.