head to head · open source

DBeaver vs TimescaleDb

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TimescaleDb has 23,540 stars, 1,150 forks, 389 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DBeaver leads on adoption by 120% (51,791 vs 23,540 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; TimescaleDb is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, TimescaleDb 5%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K TimescaleDb ★ 24K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver TimescaleDb
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 24K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Java C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick TimescaleDb if

  • You want the TimescaleDb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and TimescaleDb fits your workflow better

full TimescaleDb profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About TimescaleDb

TimescaleDB is a time series database built on top of PostgreSQL and packaged as a PostgreSQL extension. It lives in the PostgreSQL ecosystem, and it uses SQL and PostgreSQL clients such as psql and pgAdmin. The project targets high performance real time analytics on time series and event data, with repository topics for IoT, financial analysis, and historian workloads.

read the full TimescaleDb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or TimescaleDb more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and TimescaleDb has 23,540. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and TimescaleDb free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0, and TimescaleDb has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between DBeaver and TimescaleDb?

DBeaver is written in Java and TimescaleDb in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or TimescaleDb?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose TimescaleDb if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.