head to head · open source

DBeaver vs q

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped today. q has 10,360 stars, 425 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 400% (51,797 vs 10,360 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; q is written in Python under GPL-3.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, q 4%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K q ★ 10K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver q
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-02-06
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 425
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick q if

  • You want the q feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and q fits your workflow better

full q profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About q

q is a Python command line tool, licensed under GPL 3.0, that runs SQL statements directly against delimited text files and multi file SQLite databases without importing the data into a database server first.

read the full q overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or q more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and q has 10,360. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and q free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and q under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and q?

DBeaver is written in Java and q in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or q?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose q if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.