head to head · open source

DBeaver vs pgdog

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pgdog has 5,498 stars, 282 forks, 208 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DBeaver leads on adoption by 842% (51,797 vs 5,498 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; pgdog is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, pgdog 5%. pgdog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K pgdog ★ 5.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver pgdog
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 5.5K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 282
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick pgdog if

  • You want the pgdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and pgdog fits your workflow better

full pgdog profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About pgdog

PgDog is an open source proxy for scaling PostgreSQL that pools connections, load balances queries across primary and replicas, and shards entire databases, written in Rust and aimed at teams whose PostgreSQL deployments have outgrown a single client to server connection per application process.

read the full pgdog overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or pgdog more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and pgdog has 5,498. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and pgdog free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pgdog under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and pgdog?

DBeaver is written in Java and pgdog in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or pgdog?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pgdog if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.