head to head · open source

DBeaver vs orbitdb

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. orbitdb has 8,808 stars, 595 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 488% (51,797 vs 8,808 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; orbitdb is written in JavaScript under MIT. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, orbitdb 7%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K orbitdb ★ 8.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver orbitdb
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 8.8K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-05-14
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 595
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick orbitdb if

  • You want the orbitdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and orbitdb fits your workflow better

full orbitdb profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About orbitdb

OrbitDB is a serverless, distributed, peer to peer database for the decentralized web that stores its data in IPFS and syncs it with peers over Libp2p Pubsub, and it is aimed at developers building decentralized, blockchain, and local first applications in JavaScript.

read the full orbitdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or orbitdb more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and orbitdb has 8,808. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and orbitdb free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and orbitdb under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and orbitdb?

DBeaver is written in Java and orbitdb in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or orbitdb?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose orbitdb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.