head to head · open source

DBeaver vs m_flow

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. m_flow has 4,504 stars, 258 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 1,050% (51,791 vs 4,504 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; m_flow is written in Python under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, m_flow 6%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K m_flow ★ 4.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver m_flow
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 4.5K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 258
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick m_flow if

  • You want the m_flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and m_flow fits your workflow better

full m_flow profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About m_flow

M flow is a Python bio inspired cognitive memory engine positioned as a new paradigm for Graph RAG. It lives in the LLM retrieval and agent memory ecosystem, as a database like component for knowledge graphs, episodic memory, long term memory, and MCP workflows.

read the full m_flow overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or m_flow more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and m_flow has 4,504. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and m_flow free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and m_flow under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and m_flow?

DBeaver is written in Java and m_flow in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or m_flow?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose m_flow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.