head to head · open source

DBeaver vs finagle

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped today. finagle has 8,866 stars, 1,428 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 484% (51,797 vs 8,866 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; finagle is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, finagle 16%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (java, mysql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K finagle ★ 8.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver finagle
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 8.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Scala
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-13
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick finagle if

  • You want the finagle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Scala
  • You evaluated both and finagle fits your workflow better

full finagle profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About finagle

Finagle is a fault tolerant, protocol agnostic RPC system for the JVM, written in Scala and used to construct high concurrency servers, and it is aimed at JVM engineers who want one uniform client and server API across several network protocols instead of a separate stack for each one.

read the full finagle overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or finagle more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and finagle has 8,866. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and finagle free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and finagle under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and finagle?

DBeaver is written in Java and finagle in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or finagle?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose finagle if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.