head to head · open source

DBeaver vs faststream

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped today. faststream has 5,343 stars, 394 forks, 100 open issues and last shipped today. DBeaver leads on adoption by 869% (51,797 vs 5,343 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; faststream is written in Python under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, faststream 7%. faststream was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K faststream ★ 5.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver faststream
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 5.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 394
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick faststream if

  • You want the faststream feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and faststream fits your workflow better

full faststream profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About faststream

FastStream is an asynchronous Python framework for event driven services that acts as a thin client for Kafka, RabbitMQ, NATS, Redis and MQTT, giving Python developers full access to native broker features alongside generated AsyncAPI documentation, in memory tests and observability out of the box.

read the full faststream overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or faststream more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and faststream has 5,343. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and faststream free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and faststream under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and faststream?

DBeaver is written in Java and faststream in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or faststream?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose faststream if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.