head to head · open source

DBeaver vs Apache IoTDB

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Apache IoTDB has 6,402 stars, 1,157 forks, 734 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DBeaver leads on adoption by 709% (51,791 vs 6,402 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Apache IoTDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Apache IoTDB 18%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (database, java, nosql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K Apache IoTDB ★ 6.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver Apache IoTDB
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 6.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick Apache IoTDB if

  • You want the Apache IoTDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Apache IoTDB fits your workflow better

full Apache IoTDB profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About Apache IoTDB

Apache IoTDB is an Apache 2.0 licensed time series database written in Java that handles collection, storage, and analysis of industrial IoT time series data, built for teams that must ingest high throughput readings from very large fleets of devices and analyse them without leaving the Hadoop and Spark tooling they already run.

read the full Apache IoTDB overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or Apache IoTDB more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and Apache IoTDB has 6,402. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and Apache IoTDB free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Apache IoTDB under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and Apache IoTDB?

DBeaver is written in Java and Apache IoTDB in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or Apache IoTDB?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Apache IoTDB if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.