head to head · open source

DBeaver vs activegraph

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. activegraph has 1,405 stars, 273 forks, 242 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 3,586% (51,791 vs 1,405 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; activegraph is written in Ruby under MIT. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, activegraph 19%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K activegraph ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver activegraph
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Ruby
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-18
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 273
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick activegraph if

  • You want the activegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and activegraph fits your workflow better

full activegraph profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About activegraph

activegraph is a Ruby and JRuby wrapper for the Neo4j graph database, formerly called Neo4j.rb. It provides an Active Model compliant wrapper over Neo4j, so Ruby applications can work with graph data through model code and associations instead of writing low level database calls. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and sits in the database and infrastructure category, with topics that include graph database, neo4j, orm, railtie, and ruby.

read the full activegraph overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or activegraph more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and activegraph has 1,405. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and activegraph free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and activegraph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and activegraph?

DBeaver is written in Java and activegraph in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or activegraph?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose activegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.