head to head · open source

DBeaver vs acl

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. acl has 3,105 stars, 951 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 1,568% (51,797 vs 3,105 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; acl is written in C under LGPL-2.1. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, acl 31%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K acl ★ 3.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver acl
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 3.1K
License Apache-2.0 LGPL-2.1
Written in Java C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 951
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick acl if

  • You want the acl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and acl fits your workflow better

full acl profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About acl

Acl (Advanced C/C++ Library, "Advanced Cross Platform C/C++ Network Communication Library and Server Framework") is a cross platform C network communication library and server framework, with coroutine, HTTP/HTTPS/WebSocket, MQTT, SMTP, Redis, Memcached and MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQLite support, built for developers writing network servers and clients on Linux, Windows, Solaris, FreeBSD, macOS, Android, iOS and HarmonyOS.

read the full acl overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or acl more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and acl has 3,105. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and acl free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and acl under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and acl?

DBeaver is written in Java and acl in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or acl?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose acl if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.