head to head · open source

compose vs Dagu

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars, 5,825 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Dagu has 4,036 stars, 339 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 846% (38,195 vs 4,036 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Dagu is written in Go under GPL-3.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Dagu 8%. Dagu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K Dagu ★ 4.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose Dagu
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 4.0K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 339
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick Dagu if

  • You want the Dagu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Dagu fits your workflow better

full Dagu profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About Dagu

Dagu is local first workflow engine. It targets operations and internal automation. It lives in Infrastructure & Operations / Orchestration & Scheduling. It is Go project under GPL 3.0. It provides single binary with built in Web UI. It needs no external database or message broker. It runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. GitHub metadata lists 3982 stars, 332 forks, 0 contributors, 67 open issues, repo age 0 years, last push 2026 09 14.

read the full Dagu overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs ansible compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or Dagu more popular?

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars and Dagu has 4,036. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and Dagu free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Dagu under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and Dagu?

compose is written in Go and Dagu in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or Dagu?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,195 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Dagu if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.