head to head · open source
cyberduck vs rclone-ui
cyberduck has 4,900 GitHub stars, 386 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rclone-ui has 2,379 stars, 97 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cyberduck leads on adoption by 106% (4,900 vs 2,379 stars). cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0; rclone-ui is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. cyberduck has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, rclone-ui 4%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (backblaze-b2, cyberduck, dropbox, ftp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cyberduck | rclone-ui | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.9K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 386 | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cyberduck if
- You weight community size — 4.9K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rclone-ui if
- You want the rclone-ui feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and rclone-ui fits your workflow better
About cyberduck
Cyberduck This is the development home for Cyberduck, a libre file transfer client for macOS and Windows. Command line interface (CLI) for Linux, macOS and Windows. The core libraries are used in Mountain Duck. Mailing Lists There is a Google Groups Cyberduck discussion mailing list. The following additional mailing lists are hosted: News Announcements of new releases Localization Notifications about changes to the translations needed Source Source code is available licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 3. Pull requests welcome! Localizations Translations to new languages are welcome. We use…
read the full cyberduck overview →
About rclone-ui
The cross platform GUI for Rclone A light, transparent layer on top of rclone to manage your remotes & tasks in a more user friendly way. Package Managers Tap here to open the Apple App Store Tap here to open the Google Play Store Downloads Windows ( Arm , x64 ) macOS ( Apple Silicon , Intel ) Linux ( AppImage , deb , rpm ) Linux Arm ( AppImage , deb , rpm ) Docker/Homelab/Server Usage Control your server, homelab, or mom's PC with the easiest solution to manage remote rclone instances. Check out the guide for controlling remote instances. Roadmap Finalized items have been moved to the "Features" section. Check…
read the full rclone-ui overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cyberduck or rclone-ui more popular?
cyberduck has 4,900 GitHub stars and rclone-ui has 2,379. cyberduck has the larger community by that measure.
Are cyberduck and rclone-ui free?
Both are open source. cyberduck is licensed under GPL-3.0 and rclone-ui under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cyberduck and rclone-ui?
cyberduck is written in Java and rclone-ui in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cyberduck or rclone-ui?
Choose cyberduck if you want the larger community (4,900 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose rclone-ui if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.