head to head · open source
cyberduck vs rclone-ui
cyberduck has 4,791 GitHub stars, 369 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. rclone-ui has 2,269 stars, 91 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. cyberduck leads on adoption by 111% (4,791 vs 2,269 stars). cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0; rclone-ui is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. cyberduck has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, rclone-ui 4%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (backblaze-b2, cyberduck, dropbox, ftp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cyberduck | rclone-ui | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.8K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 369 | ⑂ 91 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cyberduck if
- You weight community size — 4.8K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rclone-ui if
- You want the rclone-ui feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and rclone-ui fits your workflow better
About cyberduck
Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.
read the full cyberduck overview →
About rclone-ui
rclone ui is a cross platform graphical interface for rclone and S3 storage, made for people who want to manage remotes, sync tasks, and remote rclone instances without working from the command line.
read the full rclone-ui overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cyberduck or rclone-ui more popular?
cyberduck has 4,791 GitHub stars and rclone-ui has 2,269. cyberduck has the larger community by that measure.
Are cyberduck and rclone-ui free?
Both are open source. cyberduck is licensed under GPL-3.0 and rclone-ui under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cyberduck and rclone-ui?
cyberduck is written in Java and rclone-ui in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cyberduck or rclone-ui?
Choose cyberduck if you want the larger community (4,791 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose rclone-ui if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.