head to head · open source

Spacedrive vs cyberduck

Spacedrive has 39,008 GitHub stars, 1,351 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. cyberduck has 4,788 stars, 369 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Spacedrive leads on adoption by 715% (39,008 vs 4,788 stars). Spacedrive is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence; cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0. Spacedrive has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, cyberduck 8%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Spacedrive ★ 39K cyberduck ★ 4.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Spacedrive cyberduck
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 4.8K
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in Rust Java
Last push 2026-07-29 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 369
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Spacedrive if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Spacedrive profile →

pick cyberduck if

  • You want the cyberduck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and cyberduck fits your workflow better

full cyberduck profile →

About Spacedrive

Spacedrive is an open source, cross platform file explorer built on a virtual distributed filesystem written in Rust. It unifies local and remote storage—including cloud services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and S3—into a single interface, enabling unified search, browsing, and syncing across devices without centralized servers.

read the full Spacedrive overview →

About cyberduck

Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.

read the full cyberduck overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Spacedrive vs LocalSend Spacedrive vs rclone Spacedrive vs copyparty Spacedrive vs Files Spacedrive vs yazi Spacedrive vs Nextcloud Spacedrive vs uppy Spacedrive vs cloudreve Spacedrive vs superfile Spacedrive vs ranger Spacedrive vs Seafile Spacedrive vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Spacedrive or cyberduck more popular?

Spacedrive has 39,008 GitHub stars and cyberduck has 4,788. Spacedrive has the larger community by that measure.

Are Spacedrive and cyberduck free?

Both are open source. Spacedrive has no licence declared in this registry, and cyberduck is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Spacedrive and cyberduck?

Spacedrive is written in Rust and cyberduck in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Spacedrive or cyberduck?

Choose Spacedrive if you want the larger community (39,008 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose cyberduck if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.