head to head · open source

cyberduck vs filegator

cyberduck has 4,814 GitHub stars, 372 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filegator has 3,079 stars, 452 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. cyberduck leads on adoption by 56% (4,814 vs 3,079 stars). cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0; filegator is written in PHP under MIT. cyberduck has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, filegator 15%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cyberduck ★ 4.8K filegator ★ 3.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cyberduck filegator
GitHub stars ★ 4.8K ★ 3.1K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Java PHP
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-27
Forks ⑂ 372 ⑂ 452
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cyberduck if

  • You weight community size — 4.8K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cyberduck profile →

pick filegator if

  • You want the filegator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and filegator fits your workflow better

full filegator profile →

About cyberduck

Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.

read the full cyberduck overview →

About filegator

FileGator is a free, open source, self hosted PHP web application that gives teams, schools, and administrators a browser based multi user file manager with fine grained permissions and pluggable storage backends.

read the full filegator overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cyberduck vs LocalSend cyberduck vs rclone cyberduck vs copyparty cyberduck vs Files cyberduck vs yazi cyberduck vs Spacedrive cyberduck vs Nextcloud cyberduck vs uppy cyberduck vs cloudreve cyberduck vs superfile cyberduck vs ranger cyberduck vs Seafile

Frequently asked questions

Is cyberduck or filegator more popular?

cyberduck has 4,814 GitHub stars and filegator has 3,079. cyberduck has the larger community by that measure.

Are cyberduck and filegator free?

Both are open source. cyberduck is licensed under GPL-3.0 and filegator under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cyberduck and filegator?

cyberduck is written in Java and filegator in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cyberduck or filegator?

Choose cyberduck if you want the larger community (4,814 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose filegator if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.