head to head · open source
compose vs SpringBootUnity
compose has 38,573 GitHub stars, 5,899 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SpringBootUnity has 884 stars, 431 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. compose leads on adoption by 4,263% (38,573 vs 884 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; SpringBootUnity is written in various languages under a licence not recorded in this registry. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, SpringBootUnity 49%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| compose | SpringBootUnity | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 39K | ★ 884 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Go | — |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.9K | ⑂ 431 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick compose if
- You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SpringBootUnity if
- You want the SpringBootUnity feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You evaluated both and SpringBootUnity fits your workflow better
About compose
Table of Contents Docker Compose Where to get Docker Compose + Windows and macOS + Linux Quick Start Contributing Legacy Docker Compose Docker Compose is a tool for running multi container applications on Docker defined using the Compose file format. A Compose file is used to define how one or more containers that make up your application are configured. Once you have a Compose file, you can create and start your application with a single command: docker compose up . Note : About Docker Swarm Docker Swarm used to rely on the legacy compose file format but did not adopt the compose specification so is missing…
read the full compose overview →
About SpringBootUnity
SpringBootUnity 项目简介 需求是多变的。本项目以 Spring Boot 为基础，针对不同需求把不同的技术和 Spring Boot 搭配起来，每一种搭配单独做成一个模块，因此它是一个偏使用示例的集合而非一个完整产品。 每个模块都能独立打包、独立启动，互不影响，可以只挑自己关心的那一个跑起来看。如果你在使用 Spring Boot 的过程中有什么好用的技术，欢迎提 PR。 模块一览 一共 30 个模块。 core 是被其他模块共同依赖的基础包，其余每个模块各自演示一项技术。 除 socket 使用 8081 外，其余模块都监听 8080 ，所以一次只启动一个模块。 其中 validation 、 fileupload 、 restclient 、 cache 、 actuator 、 async 、 aop 、 httpinterface 、 i18n 、 ratelimit 、 graphql 、 kafka 、 mail 、 flyway 十四个模块附带可直接运行的测试。它们的测试都不依赖外部服务—— kafka 用内嵌 Kafka、 mail 用 GreenMail 内嵌 SMTP、 flyway 用内嵌 H2，其余用 Spring 测试上下文； mvn test 即可跑通，也可以当作各自技术点的可执行文档来读。 技术栈 Spring、Jackson、Hibernate、JUnit 等版本统一由…
read the full SpringBootUnity overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is compose or SpringBootUnity more popular?
compose has 38,573 GitHub stars and SpringBootUnity has 884. compose has the larger community by that measure.
Are compose and SpringBootUnity free?
Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0, and SpringBootUnity has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between compose and SpringBootUnity?
compose is written in Go and SpringBootUnity in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, compose or SpringBootUnity?
Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,573 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SpringBootUnity if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.