head to head · open source

compose vs rtic

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rtic has 2,403 stars, 263 forks, 58 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 1,489% (38,175 vs 2,403 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; rtic is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, rtic 11%. rtic was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K rtic ★ 2.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose rtic
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 2.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 263
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick rtic if

  • You want the rtic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and rtic fits your workflow better

full rtic profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About rtic

RTIC is the Real Time Interrupt driven Concurrency framework for ARM Cortex M microcontrollers. It lives in the Rust embedded ecosystem, with topics that include bare metal, no std, concurrency, and scheduling. The README describes it as a hardware accelerated Rust RTOS and a concurrency framework for building real time systems. All Cortex M devices are fully supported, and most RISC V devices are supported.

read the full rtic overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or rtic more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and rtic has 2,403. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and rtic free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rtic under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and rtic?

compose is written in Go and rtic in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or rtic?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rtic if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.