head to head · open source

compose vs quirrel

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quirrel has 927 stars, 68 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. compose leads on adoption by 4,018% (38,175 vs 927 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; quirrel is written in TypeScript under MIT. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, quirrel 7%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K quirrel ★ 927 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose quirrel
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 927
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 68
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick quirrel if

  • You want the quirrel feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and quirrel fits your workflow better

full quirrel profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About quirrel

Quirrel is an open source task queueing solution built for serverless applications. It is written in TypeScript, distributed under the MIT license, and lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem that surrounds serverless platforms such as Next.js deployments. The project describes itself as the task queueing solution for serverless, and its homepage and documentation sit at quirrel.dev and docs.quirrel.dev. The repository has been public for roughly six years, holds 928 stars and 68 forks, and was most recently pushed in September 2026. A notice in the README states that Quirrel joined Netlify, and the orig…

read the full quirrel overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or quirrel more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and quirrel has 927. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and quirrel free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and quirrel under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and quirrel?

compose is written in Go and quirrel in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or quirrel?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose quirrel if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.