head to head · open source

compose vs Queuer

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars, 5,818 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Queuer has 1,150 stars, 46 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. compose leads on adoption by 3,220% (38,178 vs 1,150 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Queuer is written in Swift under MIT. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Queuer 4%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K Queuer ★ 1.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose Queuer
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 1.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Swift
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-15
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 46
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick Queuer if

  • You want the Queuer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and Queuer fits your workflow better

full Queuer profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About Queuer

Queuer Queuer is a queue manager built on top of OperationQueue and Dispatch (aka GCD). It allows you to create asynchronous and synchronous tasks easily, all managed by a queue, with just a few lines. Features [x] Works on all Swift compatible platforms (Linux, Android, and Windows included) [x] Easy to use [x] Well documented (100% documented) [x] Well tested (100% of code coverage) [x] Create an operation block [x] Create a single operation [x] Create chained operations [x] Manage a centralized queue [x] Create unlimited queues [x] Declare how many concurrent operations a queue can handle [x] Create semaphores…

read the full Queuer overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or Queuer more popular?

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars and Queuer has 1,150. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and Queuer free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Queuer under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and Queuer?

compose is written in Go and Queuer in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or Queuer?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,178 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Queuer if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.