head to head · open source

compose vs nextflow

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nextflow has 3,487 stars, 811 forks, 422 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 995% (38,175 vs 3,487 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; nextflow is written in Groovy under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, nextflow 23%. nextflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K nextflow ★ 3.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose nextflow
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 3.5K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Groovy
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 811
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick nextflow if

  • You want the nextflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Groovy
  • You evaluated both and nextflow fits your workflow better

full nextflow profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About nextflow

Nextflow is an open source workflow system for scalable, portable, and reproducible computational pipelines. It is written in Groovy, released under Apache 2.0, and built around a domain specific language for data driven workflows. The project lives in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, especially orchestration and scheduling, and its topics include bioinformatics, cloud, Docker, high performance computing, and reproducible research.

read the full nextflow overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or nextflow more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and nextflow has 3,487. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and nextflow free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and nextflow under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and nextflow?

compose is written in Go and nextflow in Groovy. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or nextflow?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose nextflow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.