head to head · open source
compose vs lazycodex
compose has 38,178 GitHub stars, 5,818 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lazycodex has 3,470 stars, 220 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped today. compose leads on adoption by 1,000% (38,178 vs 3,470 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; lazycodex is written in TypeScript under MIT. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, lazycodex 6%. lazycodex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| compose | lazycodex | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 38K | ★ 3.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 220 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick compose if
- You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lazycodex if
- You want the lazycodex feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and lazycodex fits your workflow better
About compose
Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.
read the full compose overview →
About lazycodex
LazyCodex The one and only agent harness for complex codebases. Project memory, planning, execution, and verified completion inside Codex. What is this? · OmO · lazycodex.ai [!NOTE] [OmO] 60K Stars: the terrifying token burner has arrived in LazyCodex. Sisyphus Labs' OmO is the quality obsessed agent harness whose public lore says it loved Anthropic models hard enough to get third party clients blocked. Now that same OmO quality bar is available for Codex through LazyCodex. If you wanted OmO but did not want the setup ceremony, start here: Context: OmO 60K Stars on X 🚀 Install One line. No global install, no npm…
read the full lazycodex overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is compose or lazycodex more popular?
compose has 38,178 GitHub stars and lazycodex has 3,470. compose has the larger community by that measure.
Are compose and lazycodex free?
Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazycodex under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between compose and lazycodex?
compose is written in Go and lazycodex in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, compose or lazycodex?
Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,178 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lazycodex if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.