head to head · open source

compose vs hof

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars, 5,818 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hof has 613 stars, 48 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. compose leads on adoption by 6,128% (38,178 vs 613 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; hof is written in Go under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, hof 8%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K hof ★ 613 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose hof
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 613
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-05
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 48
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick hof if

  • You want the hof feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and hof fits your workflow better

full hof profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About hof

hof the higher order framework A tool that unifies data models, schemas, code generation, and a task engine. hof is a CLI tool you add to your workflow. Foundation in CUE Deterministic and Agentic code generation Data models that can evolve and be input to code generation Task engine based on cue/flow Agent servers and VS Code extension hof uses CUE to power the DX and implementation. We believe CUE is a great language for specifying schemas, configuration, and generally for writing anything declarative or this is a source of truth. It has good theory and comes from the same people that brought us containers, Go,…

read the full hof overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or hof more popular?

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars and hof has 613. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and hof free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hof under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and hof?

compose is written in Go and hof in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or hof?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,178 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hof if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.