head to head · open source

compose vs earthly

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. earthly has 12,047 stars, 457 forks, 744 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. compose leads on adoption by 217% (38,175 vs 12,047 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; earthly is written in Go under MPL-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, earthly 4%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K earthly ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose earthly
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 MPL-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2025-10-23
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 457
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick earthly if

  • You want the earthly feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and earthly fits your workflow better

full earthly profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About earthly

Earthly is a container based build and CI/CD framework that runs every pipeline inside containers so the same build executes identically on a laptop, a colleague's machine, or any CI system, and it is built for engineers and platform teams who maintain build logic across monorepos or polyrepos and are comfortable with Dockerfile and Makefile style syntax.

read the full earthly overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or earthly more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and earthly has 12,047. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and earthly free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and earthly under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and earthly?

compose is written in Go and earthly in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or earthly?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose earthly if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.