head to head · open source

compose vs chart-releaser-action

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars, 5,818 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chart-releaser-action has 668 stars, 222 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. compose leads on adoption by 5,615% (38,178 vs 668 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; chart-releaser-action is written in Shell under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, chart-releaser-action 33%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K chart-releaser-action ★ 668 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose chart-releaser-action
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 668
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-01-22
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 222
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick chart-releaser-action if

  • You want the chart-releaser-action feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and chart-releaser-action fits your workflow better

full chart-releaser-action profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About chart-releaser-action

chart releaser Action A GitHub action to turn a GitHub project into a self hosted Helm chart repo, using helm/chart releaser CLI tool. Usage Pre requisites 1. A GitHub repo containing a directory with your Helm charts (default is a folder named /charts , if you want to maintain your charts in a different directory, you must include a charts dir input in the workflow). 1. A GitHub branch called gh pages to store the published charts. 1. In your repo, go to Settings/Pages. Change the Source Branch to gh pages . 1. Create a workflow .yml file in your .github/workflows directory. An example workflow is available belo…

read the full chart-releaser-action overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or chart-releaser-action more popular?

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars and chart-releaser-action has 668. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and chart-releaser-action free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and chart-releaser-action under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and chart-releaser-action?

compose is written in Go and chart-releaser-action in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or chart-releaser-action?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,178 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose chart-releaser-action if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.