head to head · open source

compose vs atmos

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars, 5,818 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. atmos has 1,379 stars, 175 forks, 289 open issues and last shipped today. compose leads on adoption by 2,669% (38,178 vs 1,379 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; atmos is written in Go under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, atmos 13%. atmos was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (orchestration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K atmos ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose atmos
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 175
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick atmos if

  • You want the atmos feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and atmos fits your workflow better

full atmos profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About atmos

Run your infrastructure anywhere. Atmos is the open source runtime for infrastructure — it builds, authenticates, and ships Terraform, OpenTofu, Kubernetes, Helm, and containers the same way on your laptop, in CI, and with AI agents. Auth, secrets, vendoring, caching, the toolchain, workflows, and CI are built in. Point every environment at the same reusable root modules and treat the rest as configuration. Stop stringing together 25 tools. Run it on your laptop. Run it the same in CI. Run it with agents. Everything is open source and free. [!TIP] You can try out atmos directly in your browser using GitHub Codesp…

read the full atmos overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or atmos more popular?

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars and atmos has 1,379. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and atmos free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and atmos under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and atmos?

compose is written in Go and atmos in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or atmos?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,178 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose atmos if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.