head to head · open source

compose vs astron-agent

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. astron-agent has 9,032 stars, 886 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. compose leads on adoption by 323% (38,175 vs 9,032 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; astron-agent is written in Java under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, astron-agent 10%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K astron-agent ★ 9.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose astron-agent
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 9.0K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 886
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick astron-agent if

  • You want the astron-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and astron-agent fits your workflow better

full astron-agent profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About astron-agent

Astron Agent is an enterprise grade, commercial friendly agentic workflow platform for building next generation SuperAgents, aimed at organizations that need to orchestrate AI workflows, models, tools, and RPA automation in production rather than in a demo.

read the full astron-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or astron-agent more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and astron-agent has 9,032. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and astron-agent free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and astron-agent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and astron-agent?

compose is written in Go and astron-agent in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or astron-agent?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose astron-agent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.