head to head · open source

compose vs agent-swarm

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars, 5,818 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. agent-swarm has 807 stars, 104 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 4,631% (38,178 vs 807 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; agent-swarm is written in TypeScript under MIT. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, agent-swarm 13%. agent-swarm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, orchestration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K agent-swarm ★ 807 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose agent-swarm
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 807
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 104
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick agent-swarm if

  • You want the agent-swarm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and agent-swarm fits your workflow better

full agent-swarm profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About agent-swarm

Agent Swarm is an MIT licensed, self hosted orchestration engine that runs a lead agent delegating goals to worker agents inside isolated Docker containers, built for teams that want their company to become AI native while keeping the work on their own infrastructure.

read the full agent-swarm overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack langgraph vs haystack trivy vs gitleaks n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs ansible compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or agent-swarm more popular?

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars and agent-swarm has 807. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and agent-swarm free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and agent-swarm under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and agent-swarm?

compose is written in Go and agent-swarm in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or agent-swarm?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,178 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose agent-swarm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.