head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs codeburn
worldmonitor has 87,032 GitHub stars, 13,211 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped today. codeburn has 11,114 stars, 843 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped today. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 683% (87,032 vs 11,114 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 11K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 843 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About codeburn
CodeBurn is a free, open source, local first tool that tracks AI coding token usage and cost across 41 tools and agents, including Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, and Grok. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under MIT, and lives in the developer tools and observability ecosystem as a command line utility with optional desktop surfaces. Every surface reads the session files that the supported tools already write to disk, so CodeBurn acts as one source of truth rather than a separate collection layer.
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or codeburn more popular?
worldmonitor has 87,032 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,114. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and codeburn free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and codeburn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and codeburn?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or codeburn?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (87,032 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.