head to head · open source

ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars, 39,368 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped today. codebase-memory-mcp has 43,844 stars, 3,573 forks, 597 open issues and last shipped today. ECC leads on adoption by 500% (263,046 vs 43,844 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; codebase-memory-mcp is written in C under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, codebase-memory-mcp 8%. codebase-memory-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (claude-code, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 263K codebase-memory-mcp ★ 44K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC codebase-memory-mcp
GitHub stars ★ 263K ★ 44K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 3.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 263K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick codebase-memory-mcp if

  • You want the codebase-memory-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and codebase-memory-mcp fits your workflow better

full codebase-memory-mcp profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About codebase-memory-mcp

codebase memory mcp is a high performance code intelligence MCP server, written in C, that indexes a codebase into a persistent knowledge graph so AI coding agents can answer structural questions in under a millisecond, and it is built for developers and teams who run agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, aider, or Kilo Code against large repositories.

read the full codebase-memory-mcp overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or codebase-memory-mcp more popular?

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars and codebase-memory-mcp has 43,844. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and codebase-memory-mcp free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and codebase-memory-mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and codebase-memory-mcp?

ECC is written in JavaScript and codebase-memory-mcp in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or codebase-memory-mcp?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (263,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codebase-memory-mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.