head to head · open source

codebase-memory-mcp vs code-review-graph

codebase-memory-mcp has 43,844 GitHub stars, 3,573 forks, 597 open issues and last shipped today. code-review-graph has 31,619 stars, 2,878 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. codebase-memory-mcp leads on adoption by 39% (43,844 vs 31,619 stars). codebase-memory-mcp is written in C under MIT; code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT. codebase-memory-mcp has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, code-review-graph 9%. codebase-memory-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (claude-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codebase-memory-mcp ★ 44K code-review-graph ★ 32K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

codebase-memory-mcp code-review-graph
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 32K
License MIT MIT
Written in C Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.6K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codebase-memory-mcp if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codebase-memory-mcp profile →

pick code-review-graph if

  • You want the code-review-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and code-review-graph fits your workflow better

full code-review-graph profile →

About codebase-memory-mcp

codebase memory mcp is a high performance code intelligence MCP server, written in C, that indexes a codebase into a persistent knowledge graph so AI coding agents can answer structural questions in under a millisecond, and it is built for developers and teams who run agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, aider, or Kilo Code against large repositories.

read the full codebase-memory-mcp overview →

About code-review-graph

code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.

read the full code-review-graph overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

codegraph vs code-review-graph gitea vs code-review-graph openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer gitea vs gogs gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

codebase-memory-mcp vs ECC codebase-memory-mcp vs react codebase-memory-mcp vs Langflow codebase-memory-mcp vs Supabase codebase-memory-mcp vs puppeteer codebase-memory-mcp vs archify codebase-memory-mcp vs PocketBase codebase-memory-mcp vs i-have-adhd codebase-memory-mcp vs ToolJet codebase-memory-mcp vs AppSmith codebase-memory-mcp vs it-tools codebase-memory-mcp vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is codebase-memory-mcp or code-review-graph more popular?

codebase-memory-mcp has 43,844 GitHub stars and code-review-graph has 31,619. codebase-memory-mcp has the larger community by that measure.

Are codebase-memory-mcp and code-review-graph free?

Both are open source. codebase-memory-mcp is licensed under MIT and code-review-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codebase-memory-mcp and code-review-graph?

codebase-memory-mcp is written in C and code-review-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codebase-memory-mcp or code-review-graph?

Choose codebase-memory-mcp if you want the larger community (43,844 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-review-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.