head to head · open source

cloudreve vs rclone-ui

cloudreve has 28,737 GitHub stars, 3,898 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. rclone-ui has 2,269 stars, 91 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 1,167% (28,737 vs 2,269 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; rclone-ui is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, rclone-ui 4%. rclone-ui was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudreve ★ 29K rclone-ui ★ 2.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudreve rclone-ui
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 2.3K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 91
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudreve if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudreve profile →

pick rclone-ui if

  • You want the rclone-ui feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rclone-ui fits your workflow better

full rclone-ui profile →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

About rclone-ui

rclone ui is a cross platform graphical interface for rclone and S3 storage, made for people who want to manage remotes, sync tasks, and remote rclone instances without working from the command line.

read the full rclone-ui overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs cloudreve localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cloudreve vs LocalSend cloudreve vs rclone cloudreve vs copyparty cloudreve vs Files cloudreve vs yazi cloudreve vs Spacedrive cloudreve vs Nextcloud cloudreve vs uppy cloudreve vs superfile cloudreve vs ranger cloudreve vs Seafile cloudreve vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudreve or rclone-ui more popular?

cloudreve has 28,737 GitHub stars and rclone-ui has 2,269. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudreve and rclone-ui free?

Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and rclone-ui under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cloudreve and rclone-ui?

cloudreve is written in Go and rclone-ui in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudreve or rclone-ui?

Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,737 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose rclone-ui if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.