head to head · open source

cloudreve vs filegator

cloudreve has 28,783 GitHub stars, 3,907 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. filegator has 3,079 stars, 452 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 835% (28,783 vs 3,079 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; filegator is written in PHP under MIT. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, filegator 15%. filegator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (file, file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudreve ★ 29K filegator ★ 3.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudreve filegator
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 3.1K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go PHP
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-27
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 452
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudreve if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudreve profile →

pick filegator if

  • You want the filegator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and filegator fits your workflow better

full filegator profile →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

About filegator

FileGator is a free, open source, self hosted PHP web application that gives teams, schools, and administrators a browser based multi user file manager with fine grained permissions and pluggable storage backends.

read the full filegator overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs cloudreve localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cloudreve vs LocalSend cloudreve vs rclone cloudreve vs copyparty cloudreve vs Files cloudreve vs yazi cloudreve vs Spacedrive cloudreve vs Nextcloud cloudreve vs uppy cloudreve vs superfile cloudreve vs ranger cloudreve vs Seafile cloudreve vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudreve or filegator more popular?

cloudreve has 28,783 GitHub stars and filegator has 3,079. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudreve and filegator free?

Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and filegator under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cloudreve and filegator?

cloudreve is written in Go and filegator in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudreve or filegator?

Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,783 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose filegator if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.