head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs Recorder
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Recorder has 5,643 stars, 1,095 forks, 136 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 869% (54,665 vs 5,643 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Recorder is written in JavaScript under MIT. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Recorder 19%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | Recorder | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Recorder if
- You want the Recorder feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Recorder fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About Recorder
【源GitHub仓库】 【Gitee镜像库】本文档中默认使用github.io部署的链接，如果无法访问，请直接下载仓库源码到本地然后双击打开html文件访问。 :open book:Recorder用于html5录音 支持在大部分已实现 getUserMedia 的移动端、PC端浏览器麦克风录音、实时处理，主要包括：Chrome、Firefox、Safari、iOS 14.3+、Android WebView、腾讯Android X5内核(QQ、微信、小程序WebView)、Electron、大部分2021年后更新的Android手机自带浏览器、2024年后更新的Android版UC内核(UC、支付宝、钉钉)；不支持： 老旧国产手机自带浏览器、老旧iOS(11.0 14.2)上除Safari外的其他任何形式的浏览器 。 支持在非浏览器环境中使用部分功能（如nodejs、各种使用js来构建的程序），使用RecordApp可在微信小程序、uni app中直接录音。 支持对任意 MediaStream 进行音频录制、实时处理，包括： getUserMedia返回的流 、 WebRTC中的remote流 、 audio、video标签的captureStream方法返回的流 、 自己创建的流 等等。
read the full Recorder overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or Recorder more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and Recorder has 5,643. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and Recorder free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Recorder under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and Recorder?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and Recorder in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or Recorder?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Recorder if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.