head to head · open source
Ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ladybird leads on adoption by 22% (66,807 vs 54,665 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, chrome-devtools-mcp 10%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | chrome-devtools-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 55K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 5.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You want the chrome-devtools-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and chrome-devtools-mcp fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or chrome-devtools-mcp more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and chrome-devtools-mcp free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and chrome-devtools-mcp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and chrome-devtools-mcp?
Ladybird is written in C++ and chrome-devtools-mcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or chrome-devtools-mcp?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.