head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs fingerprintjs
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fingerprintjs has 28,675 stars, 2,641 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 91% (54,665 vs 28,675 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript under MIT. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, fingerprintjs 9%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | fingerprintjs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 29K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 2.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fingerprintjs if
- You want the fingerprintjs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and fingerprintjs fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About fingerprintjs
FingerprintJS is an open source, client side, browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them. Unlike cookies and local storage, a fingerprint stays the same in incognito/private mode and even when browser data is purged. FingerprintJS is available under the MIT license. Demo Visit to see your visitor identifier. Now, try visiting the same page in private/incognito mode and notice that the visitor identifier remains the same ! Installation npm CDN Run this code Resources 📕 API Reference ⚛️ Sample usage with React on the StackBlitz platform 🔑…
read the full fingerprintjs overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or fingerprintjs more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and fingerprintjs has 28,675. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and fingerprintjs free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fingerprintjs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and fingerprintjs?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and fingerprintjs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or fingerprintjs?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose fingerprintjs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.