head to head · open source

chrome-devtools-mcp vs obscura

chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. obscura has 30,141 stars, 2,279 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 81% (54,665 vs 30,141 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; obscura is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, obscura 8%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser, puppeteer), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

chrome-devtools-mcp ★ 55K obscura ★ 30K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

chrome-devtools-mcp obscura
GitHub stars ★ 55K ★ 30K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.3K ⑂ 2.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick chrome-devtools-mcp if

  • You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full chrome-devtools-mcp profile →

pick obscura if

  • You want the obscura feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and obscura fits your workflow better

full obscura profile →

About chrome-devtools-mcp

Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…

read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →

About obscura

Obscura The open source headless browser for AI agents and web scraping. Lightweight, stealthy, and built in Rust. Native rendering is here. No Chromium required. 🎉 Capture screenshots, screencast live pages, and export PDFs directly with Obscura. Obscura is a headless browser engine written in Rust, built for web scraping and AI agent automation. It runs real JavaScript via V8, supports the Chrome DevTools Protocol, and acts as a drop in replacement for headless Chrome with Puppeteer and Playwright. Why Obscura over headless Chrome? Obscura inspired Cloudflare Kitesurf’s first prototype Cloudflare began by…

read the full obscura overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Frequently asked questions

Is chrome-devtools-mcp or obscura more popular?

chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and obscura has 30,141. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.

Are chrome-devtools-mcp and obscura free?

Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and obscura under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and obscura?

chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and obscura in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or obscura?

Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose obscura if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.