head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs pasteguard
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pasteguard has 805 stars, 44 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 6,691% (54,665 vs 805 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; pasteguard is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pasteguard 5%. chrome-devtools-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | pasteguard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 805 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 44 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pasteguard if
- You want the pasteguard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and pasteguard fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About pasteguard
AI gets the context. Not your private data. PasteGuard masks PII and secrets before they reach ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, your API provider, Codex, or Claude Code. Browser Chat · Apps & APIs · Coding Agents · Documentation You keep the originals. Providers see placeholders. Run it locally or self host it in your own infrastructure. What PasteGuard Protects PasteGuard is a local first privacy layer for teams that cannot send raw client data, customer records, logs, credentials, or production details directly to model providers. It works in three places: Browser Chat ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Paste customer…
read the full pasteguard overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or pasteguard more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and pasteguard has 805. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and pasteguard free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pasteguard under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and pasteguard?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and pasteguard in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or pasteguard?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pasteguard if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.