head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs chatGPTBox
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatGPTBox has 10,772 stars, 881 forks, 211 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 407% (54,665 vs 10,772 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; chatGPTBox is written in JavaScript under MIT. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, chatGPTBox 8%. chatGPTBox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | chatGPTBox | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 11K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 881 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatGPTBox if
- You want the chatGPTBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and chatGPTBox fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About chatGPTBox
ChatGPTBox Deep ChatGPT integrations in your browser, completely for free. [![license][license image]][license url] [![release][release image]][release url] [ ][release url] [![verify][verify image]][verify url] [![coverage][coverage image]][coverage url] English Indonesia 简体中文 日本語 Türkçe Install [![Chrome][Chrome image]][Chrome url] [![Edge][Edge image]][Edge url] [![Firefox][Firefox image]][Firefox url] [![Safari][Safari image]][Safari url] [![Android][Android image]][Android url] [![GitHub][Github image]][Github url] Guide Preview [Development & Contributing][dev url] Video Demonstration Credits [dev url]…
read the full chatGPTBox overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or chatGPTBox more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and chatGPTBox has 10,772. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and chatGPTBox free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and chatGPTBox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and chatGPTBox?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and chatGPTBox in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or chatGPTBox?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose chatGPTBox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.