head to head · open source
chrome-devtools-mcp vs CefFlashBrowser
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars, 5,250 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CefFlashBrowser has 5,540 stars, 248 forks, 51 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chrome-devtools-mcp leads on adoption by 887% (54,665 vs 5,540 stars). chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; CefFlashBrowser is written in C# under MIT. chrome-devtools-mcp has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CefFlashBrowser 4%. CefFlashBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| chrome-devtools-mcp | CefFlashBrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 55K | ★ 5.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 248 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick chrome-devtools-mcp if
- You weight community size — 55K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CefFlashBrowser if
- You want the CefFlashBrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and CefFlashBrowser fits your workflow better
About chrome-devtools-mcp
Chrome DevTools for agents Chrome DevTools for agents ( chrome devtools mcp ) lets your coding agent (such as Antigravity, Claude, Cursor or Copilot) control and inspect a live Chrome browser. It acts as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, giving your AI coding assistant access to the full power of Chrome DevTools for reliable automation, in depth debugging, and performance analysis. A [CLI][cli] is also provided for use without MCP. [Tool reference][tool reference] [Changelog][changelog] [Contributing][contributing] [Troubleshooting][troubleshooting] [Design Principles][design principles] Key features Get…
read the full chrome-devtools-mcp overview →
About CefFlashBrowser
CefFlashBrowser 中文 English 软件介绍 CefFlashBrowser 是一个自带 Flash Player 插件的浏览器，可以正常显示网页上的 Flash 内容，此外还支持打开本地 SWF 文件，管理 Flash 游戏存档等。 下载与使用 在 Release 下载最新的软件压缩包，解压后双击 CefFlashBrowser.exe 即可使用。 [!NOTE] 软件运行依赖 .NET Framework 4.6.2 ，若运行时提示应用程序无法启动，前往这里下载安装即可运行。 [!NOTE] 若打开软件时提示 System.IO.FileNotFoundException 异常，一般是由于缺少 Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable 导致的，前往这里下载安装后即可正常打开。 存档管理 使用 SOL存档管理器 ，可以对游戏存档进行导出、导入、修改等操作。 [!TIP] 建议在修改存档之前先对存档文件进行备份，以防数据丢失。 Star 趋势
read the full CefFlashBrowser overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is chrome-devtools-mcp or CefFlashBrowser more popular?
chrome-devtools-mcp has 54,665 GitHub stars and CefFlashBrowser has 5,540. chrome-devtools-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are chrome-devtools-mcp and CefFlashBrowser free?
Both are open source. chrome-devtools-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CefFlashBrowser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between chrome-devtools-mcp and CefFlashBrowser?
chrome-devtools-mcp is written in TypeScript and CefFlashBrowser in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, chrome-devtools-mcp or CefFlashBrowser?
Choose chrome-devtools-mcp if you want the larger community (54,665 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CefFlashBrowser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.