head to head · open source

Bruno vs tailchat

Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars, 2,890 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tailchat has 3,624 stars, 397 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 1,198% (47,027 vs 3,624 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; tailchat is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, tailchat 11%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K tailchat ★ 3.6K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno tailchat
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 3.6K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-22
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 397
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick tailchat if

  • You want the tailchat feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and tailchat fits your workflow better

full tailchat profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About tailchat

Tailchat 简体中文 Next generation noIM application in your own workspace Not only another Slack , Discord , Rocket.Chat .... If you are interested in the concept of noIM , welcome to read my blog: It's time to officially step into the era of noIM Official Documentation: Nightly version Try it online: Nightly version is the automatic compile version, that means, every commit code will be automatically compiled. The reliability and stability of the data are not guaranteed, you can deploy with stable version with docker images or github release page Motivation At present, the existing IM applications only focus on chatt…

read the full tailchat overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or tailchat more popular?

Bruno has 47,027 GitHub stars and tailchat has 3,624. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and tailchat free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and tailchat under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and tailchat?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and tailchat in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or tailchat?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,027 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tailchat if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.