head to head · open source
Bruno vs tailchat
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars, 3,068 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tailchat has 3,644 stars, 399 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 1,217% (47,992 vs 3,644 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; tailchat is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, tailchat 11%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openapi), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | tailchat | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 3.6K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 399 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tailchat if
- You want the tailchat feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and tailchat fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno Opensource IDE for exploring and testing APIs. English Українська Русский Türkçe Deutsch Français Português (BR) 한국어 বাংলা Español Italiano Română Polski 简体中文 正體中文 العربية 日本語 ქართული Nederlands فارسی Bruno is a new and innovative API client, aimed at revolutionizing the status quo represented by Postman and similar tools out there. Bruno stores your collections directly in a folder on your filesystem. We use a plain text markup language, Bru, to save information about API requests. You can use Git or any version control of your choice to collaborate over your API collections. Bruno is offline only. There…
read the full Bruno overview →
About tailchat
Tailchat 简体中文 Next generation noIM application in your own workspace Not only another Slack , Discord , Rocket.Chat .... If you are interested in the concept of noIM , welcome to read my blog: It's time to officially step into the era of noIM Official Documentation: Nightly version Try it online: Nightly version is the automatic compile version, that means, every commit code will be automatically compiled. The reliability and stability of the data are not guaranteed, you can deploy with stable version with docker images or github release page Motivation At present, the existing IM applications only focus on…
read the full tailchat overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or tailchat more popular?
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars and tailchat has 3,644. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and tailchat free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and tailchat under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and tailchat?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and tailchat in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or tailchat?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,992 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tailchat if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.