head to head · open source

Bruno vs one-api

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars, 2,888 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. one-api has 36,932 stars, 6,867 forks, 1,036 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 27% (47,022 vs 36,932 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; one-api is written in JavaScript under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, one-api 19%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K one-api ★ 37K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno one-api
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 37K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-01-09
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 6.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick one-api if

  • You want the one-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and one-api fits your workflow better

full one-api profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About one-api

One API is a self hosted LLM API management and key redistribution system that exposes many model providers through the standard OpenAI API format, aimed at developers, teams and operators who want a single endpoint, a single key model and a single quota surface across providers.

read the full one-api overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs one-api hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl Bruno vs Apache APISIX

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or one-api more popular?

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars and one-api has 36,932. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and one-api free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and one-api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and one-api?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and one-api in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or one-api?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose one-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.