head to head · open source

fastapi vs redoc

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars, 9,903 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. redoc has 25,913 stars, 2,395 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. fastapi leads on adoption by 295% (102,402 vs 25,913 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; redoc is written in TypeScript under MIT. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, redoc 9%. redoc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (openapi, openapi3), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K redoc ★ 26K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi redoc
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 26K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick redoc if

  • You want the redoc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and redoc fits your workflow better

full redoc profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About redoc

Redoc is an open source tool for generating API reference documentation from OpenAPI definitions, formerly known as Swagger. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem, ships under the MIT license, and is published on npm as the redoc package. By default it renders a responsive three panel layout: a left panel holding the search bar and navigation menu, a central panel holding the documentation itself, and a right panel showing request and response examples.

read the full redoc overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl fastapi vs Apache APISIX

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or redoc more popular?

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars and redoc has 25,913. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and redoc free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and redoc under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and redoc?

fastapi is written in Python and redoc in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or redoc?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose redoc if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.