head to head · open source

Bruno vs Insomnia

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars, 2,888 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Insomnia has 40,021 stars, 2,365 forks, 874 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bruno leads on adoption by 17% (47,022 vs 40,021 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; Insomnia is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Insomnia 6%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (api-client, http-client, rest-api), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K Insomnia ★ 40K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno Insomnia
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 40K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick Insomnia if

  • You want the Insomnia feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Insomnia fits your workflow better

full Insomnia profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About Insomnia

Insomnia is an open source, cross platform API client built with Electron and TypeScript for developing and testing APIs across multiple protocols including REST, GraphQL, WebSockets, SSE, and gRPC. It runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux and is distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. The project serves as a direct open source alternative to Postman, offering similar core functionality without vendor lock in or mandatory cloud usage.

read the full Insomnia overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl Bruno vs Apache APISIX

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or Insomnia more popular?

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars and Insomnia has 40,021. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and Insomnia free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and Insomnia under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and Insomnia?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and Insomnia in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or Insomnia?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Insomnia if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.