head to head · open source
Bruno vs redocly-cli
Bruno has 47,046 GitHub stars, 2,894 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. redocly-cli has 1,510 stars, 228 forks, 166 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bruno leads on adoption by 3,016% (47,046 vs 1,510 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; redocly-cli is written in TypeScript under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, redocly-cli 15%. redocly-cli was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (openapi, openapi3), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | redocly-cli | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 228 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick redocly-cli if
- You want the redocly-cli feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and redocly-cli fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.
read the full Bruno overview →
About redocly-cli
Redocly CLI is a TypeScript, MIT licensed command line toolset that lints, bundles, validates, tests, and renders OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, and Arazzo descriptions, built for API designers, platform teams, and CI pipelines that need API governance and reference documentation without adopting a hosted service.
read the full redocly-cli overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or redocly-cli more popular?
Bruno has 47,046 GitHub stars and redocly-cli has 1,510. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and redocly-cli free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and redocly-cli under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and redocly-cli?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and redocly-cli in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or redocly-cli?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose redocly-cli if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.